What did the original tutoring agreement between the mother and the tutor specify?

• A. The tutor would be paid $20 per hour for five hours per week for two months, with a $500 bonus for a B or better.
• B. The tutor would be paid $30 per hour for five hours per week for two months, with a $600 bonus.
• C. The tutor would be paid $20 per hour for four hours per week for two months, with no bonus.
• D. The tutor would be paid $25 per hour for five hours per week for two months, with a $400 bonus.

Answer: (A)

The key idea is that a tutoring contract must have definite, definite terms about how the tutor will be compensated, how much time is expected, and for how long the arrangement lasts. When those core details line up, the agreement is clear and enforceable. The original terms would specify the exact rate, the weekly time commitment, the duration, and any incentive that was part of the deal.

The described arrangement that matches those elements—paying the tutor $20 per hour, for five hours each week, over a two-month period, plus a $500 bonus for achieving a B or better—captures all the essential pieces: rate, quantity of work, duration, and the bonus as part of the consideration. This combination leaves little ambiguity about what was promised and under what conditions the bonus would be earned, which is why it best reflects the original agreement.

The other options change one or more core terms—the hourly rate, the number of hours per week, the length of the arrangement, or omit the bonus—so they would not align with the terms that were initially agreed upon, making them less accurate representations of the original contract.